:: Re: [DNG] Why C/C++ ?
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M+---\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MM-+\MDidier Kryn at <-
MM\MMMDidier Kryn at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Olaf Meeuwissen
Date:  
To: Steve Litt
CC: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Why C/C++ ?
Hi,

Steve Litt <slitt@???> writes:

> [...]
> I wouldn't be caught dead doing threads in C.

I'd use pthreads for pure C, std::threads in C++.

Disclaimer, reading "C++ Concurrency in Action"[1] made my head hurt :-/

[1]: https://www.manning.com/books/c-plus-plus-concurrency-in-action

Hope this helps,
--
Olaf Meeuwissen
This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
dng
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [DNG] Why MVC: was Why C/C++ ?Re: [DNG] Why MVC: was Why C/C++ ?->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)