:: Re: [DNG] vdev - udev is a dead end
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ismael L. Donis Garcia
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] vdev - udev is a dead end
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry Jensen" <hjensen@???>
To: <dng@???>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [DNG] vdev - udev is a dead end


> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:51:22AM -0500, dev wrote:
>
>>
>> On 08/10/2016 04:26 AM, Didier Kryn wrote:
>> >     Hello. Thanks to a friendly help, I've found a few mails and
>> > articles which deserve to be read:

>> >
>> >     Udev on non-systemd is a dead-end:

>>
>> So.. then.. basically any Linux distro which uses udev to populate /dev/
>> is
>> going to be S.O.L? Including Slackware presumably?
>
>
> Slackware uses eudev - not udev - as of version 14.2. So does Gentoo.
>



To my mind would be a better option to opt for eudev that vdev as it has
greater support behind.

I see half vdev orphan and do not think that support eudev go to decant by
systemd.

Best Regards
========
| ISMAEL |

========