:: Re: [Dng] Towards systemd-free pack…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jude Nelson
Date:  
To: Jaromil
CC: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Towards systemd-free packages
Hi Jaromil,

Thank you for clarifying. I'm sorry if I'm asking questions too early ;)
I'll give it another try when you feel like the SDK is ready.

I like this workflow a lot, especially the ability to build ISOs (and
presumably other bootable media). I look forward to using it to do
integration testing in a VM, for example.

Regards,
-Jude

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Jaromil <jaromil@???> wrote:

>
> hi,
>
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015, Jude Nelson wrote:
>
> >    To clarify, the SDK will pull a package from Debian, and create a new
> >    branch for each version so maintainers can observe and deal with the
> >    changes?

>
> yes.
>
> >    If so, then the maintainers (not Jenkins) will be pulling from
> >    Debian or upstream and then committing to Devuan's gitlab, thereby
> >    keeping Devuan packages in-sync with upstream.  Is this the case?

>
> yes
>
> Maintainers can use git to diff (which is very powerful at that) and the
> merging must always be done by hand and consciously. We hope to have
> enough maintainers to cover such tasks which, facilitated in such a way
> by the SDK and Git, shouldn't be so hard. Jenkins is there only to
> automate the builds of tested packages that maintainers deem ready for
> production.
>
> the SDK also makes it easy to build the packages locally into chroots
> and soon will include also a mechanism to toast all the collection into
> ISO images: a passage that Debian itself is missing to facilitate really
> if we look at the confusion of docs about debian-installer and burning
> ISOs.
>
> more in general all what is going into Devuan will pass through Git,
> this way we can all have a clear overview and detailed records of what
> happens, what goes in there and what not.
>
> your comments on this process are very welcome in this stage, as you can
> see I'm very much in the middle of writing the SDK still and can well
> integrate new ideas, however the general flow is the one described
> above.
>
> >    Unrelated, I opened in issue on the SDK.* It seems that I'm
> >    prompted for a password for "[1]git@???" when I run the
> >    "init" script.* I don't know what to put here.  Thanks

>
> Ok I'll look into it. Please give it another day or two before
> considering it ready for testing, just yesterday I've committed a rather
> big refactoring of the scripts. Passwords are seldom asked (in chroot,
> build and a few other operations) and in general sudo is used, which is
> also what schroot is using I understand. I hope Roger Leigh will be
> happy to see that we made a good use of his handy creation schroot.
>
> hack on!
>
> ciao
>
>
> --
> Jaromil, Dyne.org Free Software Foundry (est. 2000)
> We are free to share code and we code to share freedom
> Web: https://j.dyne.org Contact: https://j.dyne.org/c.vcf
> GPG: 6113 D89C A825 C5CE DD02 C872 73B3 5DA5 4ACB 7D10
> Confidential communications: https://keybase.io/jaromil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
>