Author: Hal
Date:
To: dynebolic mailinglist
Subject: Re: [dyne:bolic] NEW Release: dyne:bolic 3.0.0 codename MUNIR
specifically this document
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/releasemanagement.xml
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Hal <hh@???> wrote:
> So when you tag it stable, do you promote it i.e. add +1 to the
> state/version number?
> Check this search:
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=how+to+version+numbering+odd+even+stable+development
>
> Check sf.net
> why aren't you showing the software on sf.net
> http://sourceforge.net/search/?q=dyne%3Abolic
> reveals no results... :(
>
> Can you add a translation button from spanish to english via google or
> babel on these pages?
> https://n-1.cc/pg/blog/read/733911/dynebolic-30-anuncio-de-distribucin
>
> http://translate.google.com/#es|en|
> or
> http://translation.babylon.com/spanish/to-english/
> or
> http://www.englishforums.com/Translate/
> maybe..?
> For webpages:
> http://labnol.blogspot.com/2005/11/add-language-translation-to-website.html
> and
> http://www.googletutor.com/using-googles-translate-tool-on-your-website/
>
> Thanks Jaromil,
> great work.
> x
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jaromil <jaromil@???> wrote:
>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011, Hal wrote:
>>
>>> the linux revision for the kernel numbers use odd and even as stable
>>> and unstable
>>> thus 3.99.808 would be unstable, and 3.98.909 would be stable
>>>
>>> worth including?
>>
>> we are still in time to decide this, i wish to adopt what is most
>> intuitive for people around, also those who do not know linux scheme
>> of versioning... so basically i thought of no distinction between odd
>> and even just a progression in beta and then, if worth, tag it stable.
>>
>> ciao
>>
>> --
>> jaromil, dyne.org developer, http://jaromil.dyne.org
>> GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6 8E39
>> _______________________________________________
>> dynebolic mailing list
>> dynebolic@???
>> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
>>
>
::
Re: [dyne:bolic] NEW Release: dyne:…
