:: Re: [dyne:bolic] NEW Release: dyne:…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Hal
Date:  
To: dynebolic mailinglist
Subject: Re: [dyne:bolic] NEW Release: dyne:bolic 3.0.0 codename MUNIR
So when you tag it stable, do you promote it i.e. add +1 to the
state/version number?
Check this search:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=how+to+version+numbering+odd+even+stable+development

Check sf.net
why aren't you showing the software on sf.net
http://sourceforge.net/search/?q=dyne%3Abolic
reveals no results... :(

Can you add a translation button from spanish to english via google or
babel on these pages?
https://n-1.cc/pg/blog/read/733911/dynebolic-30-anuncio-de-distribucin

http://translate.google.com/#es|en|
or
http://translation.babylon.com/spanish/to-english/
or
http://www.englishforums.com/Translate/
maybe..?
For webpages:
http://labnol.blogspot.com/2005/11/add-language-translation-to-website.html
and
http://www.googletutor.com/using-googles-translate-tool-on-your-website/

Thanks Jaromil,
great work.
x

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jaromil <jaromil@???> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011, Hal wrote:
>
>> the linux revision for the kernel numbers use odd and even as stable
>> and unstable
>> thus 3.99.808 would be unstable, and 3.98.909 would be stable
>>
>> worth including?
>
> we are still in time to decide this, i wish to adopt what is most
> intuitive for people around, also those who do not know linux scheme
> of versioning... so basically i thought of no distinction between odd
> and even just a progression in beta and then, if worth, tag it stable.
>
> ciao
>
> --
> jaromil,  dyne.org developer,  http://jaromil.dyne.org
> GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6 8E39
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
>