:: Re: [DNG] deprecated options (Was: …
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Arnt Karlsen
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] deprecated options (Was: Refracta have a static IP)
On Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:53:08 +0100, Simon wrote in message
<7CC6BE17-5CE2-4AB4-BDD2-C86AEF85200C@???>:

> Bernard Rosset via Dng <dng@???> wrote:
>
> >> Perhaps it's time for the relevant package to spit out some notice
> >> level logging when it hits deprecated options ?
> >
> > I can't imagine the volume of information that would produce on
> > system upgrades, even updates packs. Unreadable, if you ask me: Too
> > much information = No information, as it will be discarded.
>
> No, I'm not talking about changelogs - which as you say tend to get
> very lengthy on a system upgrade and either ignored or are a pita to
> wade through, and for many users, much of what's in there isn't
> relevant to their use case. I'm talking about, as a service/daemon
> starts, then it spits out a warning notice **IFF** a deprecated
> option is encountered in the config.
>
> I've seen the latter many times, and it works - doesn't stop the
> service working, doesn't disappear in a gazzillion pages of
> changelogs that no-one reads (because a lot of the changelog isn't
> relevant to the user's use case) - but does provide a warning that
> the config needs re-visiting.


...which would warrant an email to root at that box. Don't we?

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.