:: Re: [DNG] Which DE?
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Rick Moen
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Which DE?
Quoting golinux@??? (golinux@???):

> There are always exceptions to broad generalizations. This camp has
> many LXDE aficionados who might find your declaration that LXDE is
> dead rather counterproductive.


As a reminder, I said the _project_ is dead, not that LXDE is. That
distinction's not even nuanced. It's super-wide.

E.g., I rely on the procmail codebase every single day as my LDA (local
delivery agent) and filtering tool. It hasn't had an upstream
development team in about two decades. (Of course, it's rather more
self-contained than is a DE, and far, far less in need of ongoing
maintenance and development.)

Anyway, to closely paraphrase the late Sen. Moynihan, they're entitled
to their own opinions but not to their own facts.