:: [DNG] Fw: Re: What about the boost…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: s
Date:  
To: aitor_czr
CC: dng
New-Topics: [DNG] Frontend of simple-netaid (Was: What about the boost c++ libraries?)
Subject: [DNG] Fw: Re: What about the boost c++ libraries?

>Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 12:56:13 +0100
>From: Aitor <aitor_czr@???>
>
> Only *boost-iostream* and *boost-filesystem* are required in
> simple-netaid so far, even though I could do the same job using only
> the stardard c++11, of course.
> I say this because once somebody said (here, in the mailing list) "no
> more wraps, please", but maybe referring to dbus or something similar [*].
> What do you think of?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aitor.
>
> [*] git-buildpackage is a wrap for dpkg-buildpackage and it's cool.
>
>I must add that I disagree with the overuse of smart pointers and some
>design patterns.
>I was rather surprised to see that all the gtkmm forms of
>mysql-workbench are singleton!
>


My Personal Opinion is that libboost, is something very viral in nature..
And libboost itself, is a monster in size..
I would pay attention, to dependencies :)

--
Best Regards,
tux <tuxd3v@???>