Mike Bird <mgb-devuan@???> writes:
> On Mon April 1 2019 14:18:38 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> For me that is good enough.
> When core team member Evilham writes "it still looks as
> if gdo and the build system were compromised"  I need a
> lot more than a limited admission of guilt from KatolaZ
> before trusting that Evilham was mistaken rather than
> KatolaZ just managed to hide his tracks better.
Obviously, even when trying, it is impossible to pick words in a
way since natural language is imprecise.
You are reading too much into that phrase.
In the context, it referred to the "pwned site" (still viewable)
**claiming** ("looks as") that gdo had been compromised.
If you read a paragraph further, that point is made very clear,
mention that the "joke" wouldn't have been half as bad if it had
limited in scope to the plain devuan-web.
I kindly ask you not to read things that are not there and jump to
conspirations, it is what it is: a fuck up, a beautifully executed
but a fuck up and a recognised one at that.
Discussing at this length what the fine letter said is not going
move things forward, quite the opposite.
Again: there is no reasonable ground to think devuan the signing
have been compromised or anyone with access to infrastructure is
This email could have been signed, but being abroad and all,
not the most trivial and it likely won't suffice for you, so I
better things to do, like sleeping!
This message was posted to the following mailing lists: