On 2017-12-11 14:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2017 11 Dec 10:13 -0600, Didier Kryn wrote:
>> This is the original saling argument, but it is wrong. Several persons
>> have already reported that Devuan's sysvinit booted faster than
>> Debian's systemd.
>
> It seems that as SD subsumes more and more services it would naturally
> slow down. Especially when one considers that the replaced services
> have been around for years, or even decades and are likely quite well
> debugged and optimized while the SD replacements are new code with a
> lot
> maturation needed.
>
> - Nate

And since the "bugs" are often considered wontfix "features", don't
expect it to get any better.

golinux