On 11/12/2017, golinux@??? <golinux@???> wrote:
> On 2017-12-11 14:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> * On 2017 11 Dec 10:13 -0600, Didier Kryn wrote:
>>> This is the original saling argument, but it is wrong. Several persons
>>> have already reported that Devuan's sysvinit booted faster than
>>> Debian's systemd.
>>
>> It seems that as SD subsumes more and more services it would naturally
>> slow down. Especially when one considers that the replaced services
>> have been around for years, or even decades and are likely quite well
>> debugged and optimized while the SD replacements are new code with a
>> lot
>> maturation needed.
>>
>> - Nate
>
> And since the "bugs" are often considered wontfix "features", don't
> expect it to get any better.
>

Those are not "bugs" but new features. That is the reason for "wontfix".