On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 02:55:16PM +0100, Ivan J. wrote:

[cut]

> > know the answer: no. Because if you guys tested this you would know
> > that this is impossible.
> >
> > Please revert your change.
>
> We can not build arch-specific transitional packages from what I've seen
> in Jenkins. This may be because there are no files that end up in the
> package and the package is considered being "binary" if it's built for
> an arch that is not "all".
>
> Does anyone propose any solutions to this?
>

I guess there is no need for that, since we are in line with

https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]