Author: golinux Date: To: devuan developers internal list Subject: Re: [devuan-dev] Do we need devuan-infra? Was [Monit] Connection
failed: ci.devuan.org
On 2017-11-09 09:31, Ivan J. wrote: > On Thu, 09 Nov 2017, KatolaZ wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:45:34PM +0100, Evilham wrote:
>>
>> [cut]
>>
>> >
>> > Excluding today's outage, there haven't been many emails in the past 30
>> > days.
>> >
>>
>> ...and there have been not that many emails at all from the person who
>> complains about monit, apart from a few emails about the necessity of
>> using non-free software for devuan meetings.
>>
>> I thing monit should stay in this ML. In the new (silenced) version,
>> it is indeed vewry useful.
>
> Why don't you consider IRC reporting? It's in any case more realtime
> than email.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
Maybe send monit to the #devuan-bot channel? As to the offended
recipient, KatolaZ nailed it. I won't shed a tear for his departure.