:: Re: [devuan-dev] Do we need devuan-…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: KatolaZ
Date:  
To: devuan-dev
Subject: Re: [devuan-dev] Do we need devuan-infra? Was [Monit] Connection failed: ci.devuan.org
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:45:34PM +0100, Evilham wrote:

[cut]

>
> Excluding today's outage, there haven't been many emails in the past 30
> days.
>


...and there have been not that many emails at all from the person who
complains about monit, apart from a few emails about the necessity of
using non-free software for devuan meetings.

I thing monit should stay in this ML. In the new (silenced) version,
it is indeed vewry useful.

My2Cents

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]