Author: svante.signell Date: To: devuan-dev Subject: [devuan-dev] Fwd: Re: Actions from last meeting
Sorry wrong list email address.
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: "svante.signell" <svante.signell@???>
Date: 20/10/2017 18:48 (GMT+01:00)
To: devuan-dev@???
Subject: Fwd: Re: [devuan-dev] Actions from last meeting
Forwarding from another mailer in my smartphone. Maybe it works this time
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@???>
Date: 20/10/2017 18:39 (GMT+01:00)
To: Svante Signell <svante.signell@???>
Subject: Fwd: Re: [devuan-dev] Actions from last meeting
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Svante Signell" <svante.signell@???>
Date: 20 Oct 2017 17:43
Subject: Re: [devuan-dev] Actions from last meeting
To: "devuan developers internal list" <devuan-dev@???>
Cc:
I've already supplied an eudev version renaming libudev* to libeudev* but it was rejected by parazyd. I'ts just a matter to revert to that version. Currently I'm afk so that patch has to wait until next week, if I would do that. But I think that version can easily be retreived by parazyd, if he is willing to do that. (And if the renaming is a decision we all agree upon)
There is no reason to set an epoch at all.
the package should not build or ship libudev... but libeudev and have:
"Provides: libudev1 (=<libudev version>)
"Replaces: libudev1
This allows a drop in replacement for libudev without the name conflict