:: Re: [DNG] Gnome?
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Arnt Karlsen
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:49:31 +0200, Narcis wrote in message
<2d75dd54-26ec-7d5a-e5c4-23506cbf7c8b@???>:

> El 19/09/17 a les 16:16, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI ha escrit:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:22:14 +0200
> > Narcis Garcia <informatica@???> wrote:
> >
> >> I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd.
> >> But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate
> >> was for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area.
> >
> > What does Gnome offer, that XFCE lacks ?
> >
>
> Today, mainly the well-known design to users I support.
> Most of computer users don't like computing; everyday they expect same
> usage and behavior of machines.


..are you able to "upgrade" your users to TDE, KDE, LXDE, LXQt, MATE
or Cinnamon using a Wintendo-style theme to keep your users happy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Desktop_Environment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KDE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LXDE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LXQt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MATE_(software)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinnamon_(software)

..I don't know these much, TDE is a fork off KDE-3.5 which
was great, also had Wintendo-style themes to keep users and
bean counters happy.

..compared to KDE-3.5 (and I guess TDE), KDE-4.x and Plasma
sucks, but has become endurable with 8GB ram.

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.