Hi Hendrick,

1] As has happened in the past, I'm not sure I understand what you
wrote.

2] Your comment about the issue being about a ''devuan package' did
send me into a panic, so I double-checked, and it seems that the
package is the unmodified debian 'dnscrypt-proxy_1.9.4-1_amd64.deb'
downloaded from a debian repository, as forwarded by the devuan
server. Just in case I have this wrong somehow, because it is
important, what led you to think it was a package modified by devuan,
and how did you check? I don't see any dns - related package
whatsoever at, for instance:

http://us.mirror.devuan.org/devuan/pool/main/d/

3] For EVERYONE on the list, not just Hendrick: Would SOMEONE *PLEASE*
just answer the only question ( and what I thought was a simple and
straightforward one) that I posted to this list in my original
message:

Where in devuan web-space should I cross-post the report and its fix?

4] Why is it that anytime I ask how or where I can contribute to the
project, I get either complete silence or non-answer answers?

5] @Adam Borowski: Thanks for the assessment. My decision is to leave
the debian issue in the hands of the Eric, the debian package
maintainer, who as of yet has not commented on the report. Possibly
complicating matters is that Adrian wasn't satisified with just
altering the report's severity and title - he also merged the report
into an unrelated one, so my report is not clearly listed on the
packages bug summary page.


On 2017-03-15 18:56, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:17:23PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I recently submitted what I considered a 'grave' bugreport to
> > debian[1], which had its severity downgraded to 'wishlist' and its
> > title changed, all because of systemd, which I suspect is irrelevant
> > to my report. Where in devuan web-space should I cross-post the report
> > and its fix?
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857322
>
> what strikes me about the bug report discussion is:
>
> ___
>

> > -- System Information:
> > Distributor ID:    Devuan
> > Description:    Devuan GNU/Linux 1.0 (jessie)
> > Release:    1.0
> > Codename:    jessie
> > Architecture: x86_64

>
> Also, why are you reporting a bug against Debian for a Devuan package?
>
> ___
>
> This is probably a red flag to the debian cln. They aren't to happy
> about getting ubuntu bugs either, unless they have been shown to be
> debian bugs as well.
>
> Does it indeed fail on Debian without sysv-init, whch is, technically,
> still a real thing?
>
> -- hendrik

--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0