:: Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not use…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Steve Litt
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:50:43 +0100
Jaromil <jaromil@???> wrote:

> dear Giovanni,
>
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote:
> > - on DNG ML: 145 different email addresses from 22 different time
> > zones have posted 3800 emails with an average of 633 emails/month
>
> [...]
>
> > - on devuan-discuss: 21 different email addresses from 11 different
> > time zones have posted 58 emails with an average of 8 emails/month,
> > 4 emails were sent between Saturday 21:00 and Sunday 14:00 (local
> > time of the sender)
>
> thanks for your analysis and heads-up on the issue
>
> you are right, devuan-discuss never took off. it also did not receive
> much love from any admin


DNG is a spectacular resource: I see no reason to balkanize our
community with alternatives. And, as I'll discuss in a post when I have
more time, for me, talk.devuan.org was a disaster.

SteveT

Steve Litt
November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz