Author: Rainer Weikusat Date: To: Timo Buhrmester CC: dng Subject: Re: [DNG] Is netman being adopted or was it a waste of time and
effort?
Timo Buhrmester <fstd.lkml@???> writes: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:05:00PM +0000, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> Timo Buhrmester <fstd.lkml@???> writes:
>> >> >> >> > Fatal error: can't create obj/backend.o: No such file or directory
>> >> >> >> create a dummy file in this directory and check that into the SCM.
>> >> >> > Why should the repository have to remember a build system detail?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Because the build system is part of the code.
>> >> > It would still be preferable if the build system was stand-alone, rather
>> >> > than depending on a repository twist.
>> >>
>> >> It would be "preferable" if a SCM would just store whatever one desires
>> >> to put into it.
>> > Do you have any point or do you just enjoy typing?
>>
>> One could argue that I was somewhat careless in my first reply to you as
>> I actually wrote something about you (namely, "that's your opinion but
>> not mine") which sort-of solicitated an angry retort.
> ???
>
>> However, stating that "a source code management system" or - better term
>> here - "version control system" should simply store whatever someone
>> desires to store in, just like - say - a filesystem, is certainly not
>> a personal remark.
> Correct, that is not a personal remark. Why are you pointing this out?
>
>
> Just to get back on topic since you obviously lost track of the
> discussion:
::
Re: [DNG] Is netman being adopted o…
