:: Re: [DNG] Is netman being adopted o…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Edward Bartolo
Date:  
To: Mitt Green
CC: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Is netman being adopted or was it a waste of time and effort?
Hi,

The help plain text file is NETMAN.HELP and is found under netman's
root directory. If I need to add anything to NETMAN.HELP, please reply
so that I can add the required information.

What is wrong with line 259? Can you post what any relevant error messages?

Regarding adding an obj and bin directories, there is a complication
as netman is two projects in one: GUI frontend written in Lazarus
Object Pascal and the backend written in C. I would appreciate if more
direction is given to me in this regard.

Edward



On 20/11/2015, Mitt Green <mitt_green@???> wrote:
> This discussion went somewhere. Here's my
> summary:
>
> 1. netman can't be used yet because
>      - source code lacks bin and obj folders;
>      - something has to be done in backend.c,
>     in particular on line 259;
>      - packages built from the source
>     don't work either;
>      - ‎lack of man page;
>      - the actual docs should be named README.
>
> 2. I am interested in netman; there are no real
> lightweight network managers, even more, nothing
> written with gtk+2.
>
> 3. Things are going slowly and nothing had been
> decided yet as far as I see. Well, except for eliminating
> systemd. The question about adoption or abortion
> came up a bit early.
>
> Please consider my two cents,
>
> Mitt
>