Apologies in advance for digressing, but it honestly amazes me how ignorant
and passive Linus and RMS have been about the whole systemd fiasco since
it's inception. Also, the one person that really astounded me at his
concession to systemd was Shuttleworth. I figured if anyone were going to
fight the fight, it would be him. I've never been so disappointed in a
visionary I previously admired. Hopefully, one of them will eventually
come around and make a stand.

Linux O'Beardly
@LinuxOBeardly
http://o.beard.ly
linux.obeardly@???

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Emiliano Marini <emilianomarini82@???
> wrote:

> Interesting article from Richard Stallman.
>
> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/applying-free-sw-criteria.html
>
> It starts with:
>
> *"For a software package to be free, all the code in it must be free. But
> not only the code. Since documentation files including manuals, README,
> change log, and so on are essential technical parts of a software package,
> they must be free as well."*
>
> And concludes with:
>
> *"As new situations arise, the GNU Project and the Free Software
> Foundation will adapt our freedom criteria so as to lead computer users
> towards freedom, in practice and in principle."*
>
> Maybe RSM has some concern about Red Hat, systemd and the new idea of
> "freedom of code vs. freedom of developers"?
>
> Cheers,
> Emiliano.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
>