:: Re: [Dng] What about pulseaudio, av…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Patrick Erdmann
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [Dng] What about pulseaudio, avahi, ... ?
In my experience pulse should be optional. It works. Not good but it
does what its made for (after years of development). But avahi is
unstable... Does not work for me. I often had this problem: Network was
not reachable, because of avahi.


On 01.04.2015 21:33, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:25 PM, toto titi <voidtothetenth@???> wrote:
>> Do you plan to get rid of pulseaudio and avahi as well, or do you just
>> focus on systemd ?
>
> (I don't speak for the VUA but, from what i've been reading...)
>
> Systemd is perceived as not freedom-friendly, hence the fork. If
> pulseaudio and/or avahi are similar, in this respect, to systemd then,
> yes, they may be forked in the future. However, the purpose is not to
> dePoetterize but to make sure you always have choice: in what init
> system you want to use, what sound daemon, what zeroconf daemon, what
> ever, etc. So if you don't like <insert software name here>, ideally
> you should be able to replace it with something else without
> completely crippling your system. Or rather, replacing it would be a
> no-brainer in Devuan.
>
> Cheers,
> Nuno
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>