:: Re: [Libbitcoin] Adding sign byte b…
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMMPeter Todd at <-
MM 
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Amir Taaki
Date:  
To: libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Libbitcoin] Adding sign byte back into fetch_stealth
02 it is because even numbers are nicer than 03.

On 01/09/2015 01:33 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 11:23:17AM -0800, Eric Voskuil wrote:
>> We would flip a coin and document the required sign. This would place a constraint on the payer, but it should not be a material burden.
>
> ACK
>
This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
libbitcoin
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Libbitcoin] Adding sign byte back into fetch_stealth[Libbitcoin] "secp256k1 ready and well tested"->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)