:: Re: [Libbitcoin] Adding sign byte b…
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMMAmir Taaki at <-
MMAmir Taaki at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Peter Todd
Date:  
To: Eric Voskuil
CC: libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Libbitcoin] Adding sign byte back into fetch_stealth
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 11:23:17AM -0800, Eric Voskuil wrote:
> We would flip a coin and document the required sign. This would place a constraint on the payer, but it should not be a material burden.

ACK

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000790048becf700986b11ae4693523850e8e24c4f261cc435
This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
libbitcoin
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[Libbitcoin] "secp256k1 ready and well tested"Re: [Libbitcoin] Adding sign byte back into fetch_stealth->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)