On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 07:08:00AM +0000, Isaac Dunham wrote:
>
> Just to illustrate how tied into systemd things are:
> I just noticed that bsdutils (Essential: yes) pre-depends on libsystemd;
> this is for the sake of logger.
> To get rid of libsystemd, you need to rebuild logger without that--but
> that might well screw up the systemd journal for those who use systemd...

Yes, you right.
But if we will rebuild bsdutils without libsystemd and then continue to
support (ideally of course) systemd for pid1 without the logger?

Probably systemd won't work this way, and if it don't work, well,
systemd will be not supported, end of the story.

But if there is a way to make it work as init without the logger, why
not support it as an option?

The main idea is that we will NOT push out systemd cause we hate it.
Systemd will push out itself cause it won't work with other things.

The pratical result is the same, but the philosophy behind it is very
different.


--

Franco Lanza
My blog: http://www.nexlab.it
email: nextime@???
Fax/Tel: +39 0331 682151
Cell: +39 339 8125940
Lonate Pozzolo (VA) - Italy
-----------------------------------
NO TCPA: http://www.no1984.org
you can download my public key at:
http://danex.nexlab.it/nextime.asc || Key Servers
Key ID = D6132D50
Key fingerprint = 66ED 5211 9D59 DA53 1DF7 4189 DFED F580 D613 2D50
-----------------------------------
echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D212153574F444E49572045535520454D20454B414D204F54204847554F4E452059415020544F4E4E4143205345544147204C4C4942snlbxq | dc
-----------------------------------