Am Montag, 1. Dezember 2014 schrieb Franco Lanza:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 07:08:00AM +0000, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> >
> > Just to illustrate how tied into systemd things are:
> > I just noticed that bsdutils (Essential: yes) pre-depends on libsystemd;
> > this is for the sake of logger.
> > To get rid of libsystemd, you need to rebuild logger without that--but
> > that might well screw up the systemd journal for those who use systemd...
>
> Yes, you right.
> But if we will rebuild bsdutils without libsystemd and then continue to
> support (ideally of course) systemd for pid1 without the logger?
>
> Probably systemd won't work this way, and if it don't work, well,
> systemd will be not supported, end of the story.
>
> But if there is a way to make it work as init without the logger, why
> not support it as an option?
>
> The main idea is that we will NOT push out systemd cause we hate it.
> Systemd will push out itself cause it won't work with other things.
>
> The pratical result is the same, but the philosophy behind it is very
> different.
>
>

Well, how many people do you have to divert your efforts on systemd and sysv?


--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.