Author: Bruno Gola
Date:
To: System undo crew
Subject: Re: [unSYSTEM] Silk Road 2 Seized
https://pdf.yt/d/RpyX9_xmapTkhmkb
On 11/06/2014 08:30 PM, Diego Saa wrote:
> http://agorahooawayyfoe.onion
> <http://agorahooawayyfoe.onion/register/Gc2h4eoFAE>
>
> 2014-11-06 12:13 GMT-05:00 Victor Vdb <victor.vdbu@???>:
>
>> While we're waiting for OpenBazaar, do you know other alternatives to
>> SilkRoad 2.0?
>> On Nov 6, 2014 5:59 PM, "Caleb James DeLisle" <cjd@???> wrote:
>>
>>> It wasn't a backdoor in TOR, not even once <trollface>
>>>
>>> Seriously though, the 51% attack on TOR is (AFAIK) basically just
>>> getting enough relays to be at every place in the path, you get
>>> infinite tries and you only have to get lucky once and the way the
>>> FBI has historically used small armies of infiltrators, I can't see
>>> how this kind of network should be considered safe against a
>>> determined adversary.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/06/2014 05:51 PM, Tim Patrick wrote:
>>>> http://www.wired.com/2014/11/feds-seize-silk-road-2/
>>>>
>>>> I wonder how the FBI will explain how they were able to uncover the
>>>> identity of this guy?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
::
Re: [unSYSTEM] Silk Road 2 Seized
