:: Re: [unSYSTEM] Transferring btc-fia…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Adam Gibson
Date:  
To: System undo crew
Subject: Re: [unSYSTEM] Transferring btc-fiat using ssl logging and oracles
OK, but there were two independent confirmations in the comments to the
coindesk article; that's what I thought was significant.


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Mihai Alisie <mihai@???>wrote:

> I just talked with Nejc from BitStamp and he says they didn't had any
> problems with incoming deposits. Maybe it's BS or not -that- bad.
>
> Cheers,
> Mihai
>
> On 22/11/13 21:05, Robert Williamson wrote:
>
> and TransferGo
> http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinUK/comments/1r7lek/banks_block_sepa_transfers_to_bitstamp/
>
>
>
>
> On 22 November 2013 20:00, Adam Gibson <ekaggata@???> <ekaggata@???> wrote:
>
>
> Events are accelerating....http://www.coindesk.com/dutch-bank-rabobank-blocks-bitcoin/ The most
> blatant example I've seen yet. Blocking ALL attempts to fund at BTC
> exchanges, if I read it right.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Adam Gibson <ekaggata@???> <ekaggata@???> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the responses. We'll be in Milan on the 2nd December. Looking
> forward to it.
> I just opened reddit and saw this, another example of the problems
> William describes (by the way, btc-e is not really new William!):http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinUK/comments/1r7lek/banks_block_sepa_transfers_to_bitstamp/
> We want people to be able to do peer to peer bank transfer with the
> possibility of proving they've done it, thus enabling trust.
>
> Our coding isn't finished; so far we've focused on that proof aspect,
> that part is finished and being tested with real bank examples (although
> far too few - if anyone wants to volunteer to try it, look at the
> instructions in my previous message),also we've got multisig code ready for
> the escrow of btc. The messaging part isn't finished. There's also the
> possibility of integration with OpenTransactions which dansmith is actively
> looking at right now.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:57 PM, William Patterson <wpatterson1@???
>
> wrote:
>
> I also agree with Mathias, and have found a new project called BTC-E athttps://btc-e.com/
> where you can buy BTC as well as other digitals for
> much less than at Localbitcoins. But the achilles heel is still getting
> funds into the project. Us guys here in the USA are shut out from nearly
> all the e-currency exchangers by our oppressive over-reaching all-spying
> government! Yea to anarchists like Amir Taaki and Cody Wilson, et al.
> Viva Liberitad!
>
> Thanks for listening,
> Bill
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Mihai Alisie
>
> Sent: 11/21/13 09:26 PM
>
> To: System undo crew
>
> Subject: Re: [unSYSTEM] Transferring btc-fiat using ssl logging and
> oracles
>
> I agree with Mathias. Also looking forward to hearing more about your
> project.
>
> Cheers,
> Mihai
> On 22/11/13 03:22, Mathias Groennebaek wrote:
>
> Your project sounds very promising, exchanges are the achilles heel of
> bitcoin, and in many cases the people who are most likely to pursue
> regulatory compliance are people who run exchanges.
>
> Localbitcoins is a good project, but it lacks ease of use. Which is key.
>
> Would be interresting to hear more about.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Adam Gibson <ekaggata@???> <ekaggata@???> <ekaggata@???> <ekaggata@???> wrote:
>
>
> Myself and dansmith on the BTC talk forum have been developing a system
> for allowing people to buy BTC via bank accounts,OK Pay and others without
> the need for trusting a third party, by making a verifiable record of the
> ssl session, and using 2 of 3 multisig for dispute resolution. The project
> is described in brief here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=326233.msg3499434#msg3499434
>
> and we already have "oracle" machines running for testing.
>
> Code is at https://github.com/themighty1/ssllog and other places.
>
> Detailed technical descriptions aren't really set up but you can see the
> (completely rambling) development in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=173220.msg3429555#msg3429555.
>
> Would people be interested in our coming to Milan to discuss it?
> I realise (well I think I do) that the meetup/conference is not mostly
> about this kind of thing, but I just thought there might be some interest.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
> --
> Editor-in-Chief Bitcoin Magazine
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.nethttps://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.nethttps://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.nethttps://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
> --
> Editor-in-Chief Bitcoin Magazine
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>