:: Re: [DNG] vdev status update in dae…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Steve Litt
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] vdev status update in daedalus
aitor said on Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:06:45 +0200

>On 19/7/25 12:48, aitor wrote:
>
>> I'll push these examples to git because I think they illustrate very
>> well the use of daemonlets.
>
>At this point, I have a doubt about which coding style is more
>acceptable. It seems to me that eudev uses the kernel coding style,
>except for namely functions, that should have the opening brace at the
>beginning of the next line, thus
>
>int  function(int  x)
>{
>         body  of  function
>}

>
>instead of:
>
>int  function(int  x)  {
>         body  of  function
>}

>
>as eudev does. However, I prefer the first one.


I prefer the second way for one reason: It's how Vim naturally formats
C and several other languages.

Before encountering Vim, I used the Whitesmiths format:

int function(int x)
    {
    body of function
    }


In my opinion Whitesmiths blockiness is very readable.

SteveT

Steve Litt

http://444domains.com