On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 07:05:49 +0200, Marko wrote in message
<e17698ac-f233-4ef6-b46c-6c4f03e3b816@???>:

> On 2025-06-13 11:37, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Kevin Chadwick via Dng - 13.06.25, 13:18:07 CEST:
>
> > What remains to be seen is whether it is feasible to have GNOME in
> >
> Devuan
> > in a long term. Depends on whether some people develop
> > replacements for what they rely on Systemd in the future, I'd say.
> >
>
> I think that in such a situation, when we have so many good
> alternatives, investing so much time and energy into GNOME is
> wasteful.

..the gnome (version 1?) that was in S.u.S.E.-5.2, was
_wonderful_ in that very wonderful way wonderful things
should be _wonderful_.

..nowadays, if you want GNOME or anything else systemd,
you need to put it all in virtual machines.

..me, I'd prefer Devuan to put anything that depends on
Debian et al's usrmerge in in virtual machines.

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.