On May 26, 2025 5:02:14 PM UTC, Antony Stone <Antony.Stone@???> wrote:
>On Monday 26 May 2025 at 17:37:09, Radhitya via Dng wrote:
>

>> On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 11:30:28 -0400, Curtis Maurand via Dng wrote:
>> >    I've been playing with a preview version of Excaliber.  I was curious
>> >    to see what was in it as far as the kernel and versions of software.
>> >    I'm impressed.  Thank you to all the developers who put this together.
>> >    Cheers

>>
>> i have been using devuan unstable for more than six months.
>> my experiences are great and have fewer problem.
>
>Do you really mean unstable - ceres? I'd be interested to know what problems
>you encountered with chimaera or daedalus that make ceres better for you.
>

Yeah, i do. I wrote excalibur because it appeared from my neofetch output: 'excaliber/ceres'.

In short, i'm not interested to use stable branch, so i decided to install unstable version.

I forgot why i choose it over testing xD.

>> it is just too much package should be updated if you let it be for a long
>> time
>
>Well, for a version that's not yet fully released, I think that's only to be
>expected :)
>

Indeed, i know that. What i mean is: if you did not upgrade the program for a long time, then the list of upgradable applications will fulfill you.

Currently, there are 9xx applications that need updating.

>Antony.
>