Thanks for those links. I hadn't seen the first one - it's very
interesting.

(I find it interesting that nowhere in the first blog does the author
mention the fact that systemd isn't optional. For me, this is the
elephant in the room - not just in this blog, but in virtually
everything I read about systemd.)

On Sat, 2024-06-15 at 14:37 +0300, Lars Noodén via Dng wrote:
> On 6/15/24 09:36, Steve Litt wrote:
> [snip]
> > I'd like to recommend somebody, hopefully in a United States time
> > zone, who can authoritatively refute all the systemd bullshit. I
> > don't mean from a practical viewpoint; I could do that. I mean from
> > a byte-for-byte viewpoint.
> [snip]
>
> Maybe track down an author of these posts / sites?
>
> "systemd, 10 years later: a historical and technical retrospective"
> https://blog.darknedgy.net/technology/2020/05/02/0/
>
> "Combatting revisionist history - Debian User Forums"
> https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=120652
>
> "No systemd"
> https://nosystemd.org/
>
> /Lars
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng