:: Re: [DNG] Tmpfs
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: karl
日付:  
To: dng
題目: Re: [DNG] Tmpfs
Martin Steigerwald:
...
> I have /tmp on tmpfs in /etc/fstab as follows:


I also have /tmp on tmpfs, /var/tmp on disk, works perfectly fine here.

I kindof prefer each user to have their own TMPDIR, you can do that by
having this in /etc/profile, while not perfect in every regard, it
works fine here:

if [ "$UID" != 0 ]
then
  TMPDIR=$HOME/tmp
  export TMPDIR
  if [ ! -d $TMPDIR ]
  then
    /bin/rm -f $TMPDIR
    /bin/mkdir $TMPDIR
  fi
fi


...
> On AmigaOS it was clear in the sense that they called the ram disk well
> "Ram Disk"¹. If you understand what RAM means, you get that its lost on
> switching off and possibly a reboot. (AmigaOS also has a (non default)
> RAM disk driver that does survive a soft reset.)


RAM = random access memory, which I guess SSDs kindof are.

> But why do I even argue about usability here. :) Linux is still a system
> that is based on UNIX concepts (not code, concepts). And I bet the
> inventors of UNIX did not have the typical desktop user of the current
> times in their mind. You bolt a desktop environment on top of Linux
> all the way you want… below the surface Linux will not really be as
> user friendly as AmigaOS :)

...
> Sometimes I would love to start a new OS out of the lessons learned…

...

Perhaps, but swapping floppies was terrible and the choise to use scsi
instead of ide made the disk alternative expensive.
Below the surface there was e.g. copper lists, I don't call that user
friendly much but a lot of users played with it.

Don't remember much of the amiga, what was it that was user friendly
underneath ?

Regards,
/Karl Hammar