:: Re: [DNG] Food for thought?
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Steve Litt
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Food for thought?
altoid via Dng said on Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:52:45 -0300

>Hello:
>
>On 18 Feb 2024 at 14:19, Johan Helsingius via Dng wrote:
>
>> On 18/02/2024 12:45, Antony Stone wrote:
>> We are drifting dangerously off-topic ...
>
>Indeed ...
>Me thinks that we _have_ (quite a few contributions ago) drifted off
>topic.
>
>Must confess that my OP with the corresponding quote had, more than
>anything else, the intention pointing out what I see* as a severe
>contradiction between Unix/Linux philosophy (ie: way of doing things)
>and how what the autor of the piece (Liam Proven) describes as the
>Wayland protocol can possibly fit into/within its accepted
>boundaries.


I don't see a need for a confession. I've enjoyed this whole thread.

SteveT

Steve Litt

Autumn 2023 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century
http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21