:: Re: [DNG] email programs (??right w…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: onefang
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] email programs (??right word??)
On 2023-11-25 00:37:30, Joel Roth via Dng wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 05:17:11PM +1100, terryc wrote:
> > What the problem is that there is no overall archiving system that
> > makes all this information searchable. What was that FOSS programm
> > that sucked up all your lists and provided a searchable web portal.I
> > had to shut mine down as it needed an easyway to mangle all the
> > collected email addresses.
>
> The maildir-utils package has a program `mu` that can index
> and search mbox or Maildir folders for keywords. I use it
> with mutt. I am sure it can be integrated with other mail
> clients, since it simply creates a folder with the matching
> messages.


Speaking of mutt, back in ASCII the mutt package was actually neomutt,
but neomutt got it's own package now. neomut is what I use, but I use
the ASCII version, coz of two bugs.

Normally new emails are marked N, and you can mark emails as O. If
there's no N emails in a folider, it'll show you the first O one when you
enter the folder, then you can skip to the next O one. The bug is that
when you enter a folder the O's are shown as N, and act like them. NOt
that if you then go back to using the ASCII version, the O's are back as
they where.

But the real killer bug - random emails are marked as "to be deleted"
sometimes. So you get a "Purge 6 emails?" question when you leave a
folder sometimes.

I just tested the Daedalus version, it still has those bugs. So I'm
sticking with the ASCII version.

--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.