:: [DNG] Scheme/Lisp: was What is your…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Steve Litt
Date:  
To: dng
Old-Topics: Re: [DNG] What is your take on finit?
New-Topics: Re: [DNG] Functional languages
Subject: [DNG] Scheme/Lisp: was What is your take on finit?
Nikolaus Klepp via Dng said on Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:55:30 +0100

>Anno domini 2022 Tue, 1 Feb 11:44:37 -0500
> Steve Litt scripsit:


>> In the hands of anything but a very careful and
>> security-knowledgeable programmer, writing Python3 is more secure
>> than writing C. You could think of Python3 as C with seatbelts and
>> airbags, and a heck of an inefficient transmission.
>
>When it comes to this, I still prefer Scheme/Lisp seatbelts and
>airbags. But that's most likely because I have a grey beard and the
>first "high level" languages where indentation kicked my butt were
>fortran and cobol. Seeing that resurrected in python is like return of
>the living dead ...
>
>Nik


Hi Nik,

I've been trying for over a decade to learn Scheme, or any other
functional programming language. I've failed every time. Since 1982
I've been a structured programmer using functional decomposition as a
design method. I can do OOP, although I'm not that impressed by it.

How can I acquire the proper mindset to do Scheme or other functional
languages the right way, so I can finally start functional programming
that doesn't have a C accent?

Thanks,

SteveT

Steve Litt
Spring 2021 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful
Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques