Author: Hendrik Boom Date: To: dng Subject: Re: [DNG] [OT] Nasty Linux systemd security bug revealed
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 11:32:51PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:35:52 +0200, Didier wrote in message
> > Le 29/07/2021 à 20:10, Andreas Messer a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 03:58:02PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> > >
> > >> Similarly, more investment should be put in software so as to
> > >> make a review of available languages suited for mssion-critical
> > >> applications and invest in learning the chosen language. C and C++
> > >> are so error-prone that they are really not suited.
> > > Well, you can implement bugs in any kind of language. To be honest,
> > > crashes are the most easy ones to find. I know there are other
> > > languages outside but here applies the same as above: I'm not the
> > > one to decide.
> > Not all language are equal. Some really discourage bad
> > programming, meaning it takes a big effort to actually program
> > badly/unsafely, while it is still possible. Others open traps under
> > your feet everywhere.
> ..2 lists on these 2 kindsa programming languages would be nice.
I like to use the safest programming language that is compatible with
the functions the program is to perform.
This message was posted to the following mailing lists: