Author: g4sra Date: To: dng Subject: Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?
On 05/10/2020 16:50, g4sra via Dng wrote: > Hi Tom, Mason, Anybody else...
> Beowulf lxc 1:3.1.0+really3.0.3-8 amd64 is broken.
> Simple test I picked up from the internet:
> ~# lxc-usernsexec
> Failed to find subuid or subgid allocation --snip-- >
> Considering what steps to take next...
After some tracing it seems that lxc-usernsexec is only failing for the default case.
When used internally by LXC, it appears lxc-usernsexec is always passed arguments and therefore this bug has little impact.
This message was posted to the following mailing lists: