:: Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: g4sra
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?
On 05/10/2020 16:50, g4sra via Dng wrote:
> Hi Tom, Mason, Anybody else...
>
> Beowulf lxc 1:3.1.0+really3.0.3-8 amd64 is broken.
>
> Simple test I picked up from the internet:
>
> ~# lxc-usernsexec
> Failed to find subuid or subgid allocation

--snip--
>
> Considering what steps to take next...


None...

After some tracing it seems that lxc-usernsexec is only failing for the default case.
When used internally by LXC, it appears lxc-usernsexec is always passed arguments and therefore this bug has little impact.