On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:11:16 +1100
Andrew McGlashan via Dng <dng@???> wrote:

> > Hi,
>
> On 28/12/19 9:03 pm, Alexis PM via Dng wrote:
> > A mediocre result, neither good nor bad. The best option for people
> > who don't want to use systemd, Option 6 "E: Support for multiple
> > init systems is Required", came in last. But Option 1 "F: Focus on
> > systemd" came in second place, if it had won it would have been a
> > tragedy.
>
> It's completely broken when only one group of interested parties have
> the only say; DDs should be ashamed. Another wasted opportunity to
> make things right has been blown and there probably won't be any other
> opportunity afforded ever again :(
>
> Debian needs to somehow find a way to include users (especially
> sysadmins) in a meaningful way in votes of such significance.
>
> A.
> > _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

I know Devuan has been pretty much more or less 'to create a binary
compatible Debian but without systemd', but at what point would it be
determined that the best course of action may be to leave Debian behind
and continue our own way? Probably won't happen any time soon due to
manpower issues but it's worth thinking about.

--