Author: John Morris Date: To: dng Subject: Re: [DNG] Insane defaults on Raspberry Pi images - How to fix
corruption/dataloss
On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 04:06 -0800, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > Well, I was thinking more along the lines of the "early" failure rate
> for SSD and not so much the convenience of a thing as small as my baby
> finger nail with insane amounts of
> storage. I have active and still in use rotational media from the
> 90's. SSD just can't do that and flash... We don't need to go into
> it. That's what started this thread.
There is a big difference between SD cards, USB sticks and real SSDs
too. And there is another big difference between consumer SSD and
Enterprise gear. Here is some real world data. Drive has been in
pretty much constant use in production at a public library running the
online catalog and in house cataloging / automation / etc. since 2011.
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Intel X25-M SSD
Device Model: INTEL SSDSA2M160G2GN
Serial Number: CVPO0510036E160AGN
Firmware Version: 2CV102HD
User Capacity: 160,041,885,696 bytes
Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is: 7
ATA Standard is: ATA/ATAPI-7 T13 1532D revision 1
Local Time is: Thu Nov 14 15:09:55 2019 CST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
So yeah I trust SSDs now in production workloads. It is in a RAID1
though so trust but verify is still the watchword. There are six of
these drives in the three servers making up our Evergreen install, all
bought at the same time and all still going strong. Unless something
unusual happens they are more likely to be taken out of service for
being too small than becoming unreliable.