On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 09:08:52AM +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> On 09/02/19 03:04, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 06:53:46AM +0000, Mark Hindley wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:33:06AM +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> >>>> How do we want to resolve this? With my elogind hat on, I would like to see slim
> >>>> work with it. It isn't immediately clear to me that slim can be made to support
> >>>> both elogind and consolekit in a single binary.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure on that as consolekit2 is supposed to also be able to
> >>> utilise logind interfaces - but I don't know how mature that is yet.
> >>
> >> Thanks, I didn't realise that. I will have to do some reading as to how that is
> >> supposed to work. At the moment elogind and consolkit conflict and are not
> >> coinstallable.
> >
> > Dan,
> >
> > Can you point me to the documentation for this?
>
> "use the source, Luke" ;-)
> >
> > I can only find mention of consolekit2 emulating the logind implementation. But
> > it uses its own DBus API.
> >
> https://consolekit2.github.io/ConsoleKit2/

Yes that is what I found. I can't see anything about consolekit2 utilising
logind interfaces there. It emulates some logind methods but on a
differen DBUs API. Am I missing something?

Mark