:: Re: [DNG] /usr to merge or not to m…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: KatolaZ
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] /usr to merge or not to merge... that is the question??
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 08:52:26PM +0000, Simon Hobson wrote:
> golinux@??? wrote:
>
> > Sooooo . . . if the choice to avoid the merge is only available with debian-installer what does that mean for the live isos? Will they be configured with or without the merge as default?
>
> Does it make any difference at all on a live ISO ? If it's setup merged, then anything referencing /bin (etc) will follow the symlink and access /usr/bin (etc).
> However, as the default for Devuan seems likely to be unmerged, then it would make sense for the live ISOs to be the same. Scripts etc will have to be written to deal with the unmerged (split) layout so nothing should break that way - unless the script is written by someone assuming that nothing in the world runs unsplit any more. Any such scripts will need fixing to run on installed systems anyway, so would then run on a live ISO with split directories.
>


It does make a difference since we allow to install from the live,
using refractainstaller (not d-i). I guess the ISOs themselves will be
built without a merged usr, and then we will let the user choose if
they want a merged usr in case they decide to install from the live.

KISS

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]