On 11/09/2018 14:55, Steve Litt wrote:
> As far as fixing Lurker, why not use a different archive machine? Even
> when Lurker works, I find using its representation of email history
> almost inscrutable. Every other Mailman-run mailing list has a nice,
> easy archive, although they usually aren't searchable. But then again,
> neither is Lurker.
>
> LOL, a part of me wants to make a new archive representer (assuming the
> messages are stored in maildir), but I just don't have the time.

Take a look at Postorius and HyperKitty, the new web UI archiver for
Mailman3.

According to the HyperKitty docs at
https://hyperkitty.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ this is a demo system:
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

--
Mark Rousell