:: Re: [DNG] Devuan, Firefox and Apuls…
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MRick Moen at <-
Mdev at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Rick Moen
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Devuan, Firefox and Apulse
Quoting zap (calmstorm@???):

> I would agree adblock is much more memory intensive and ethically unsound.

ABP's 'Acceptable Ads' whitelisting is pretty questionable. OTOH, it's
openly documented (e.g., https://adblockplus.org/acceptable-ads) and
easy to revert. Just uncheck the 'Allow nonintrusive advertising' checkbox.



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
dng
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [DNG] Devuan, Firefox and ApulseRe: [DNG] Systemd-free => Gnome-free? [Was: Re: Gnome?->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)