On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Evilham wrote:

> Am 10/09/2017 um 21:36 schrieb Svante Signell:
> > The current absence of main developers for these meetings (as well as
> > software/infrastructure upgrades/mail contributions) makes me _very_
> > worried
> > about the future of Devuan. Anything (we who cares) can do?
> >

> Why? Devuan is having a Governance crisis. Surely, I am not the only
> one noticing this.
>
> I must admit, at first I thought this crisis was a technical one, and
> my attempt at helping solve it may have made things worse. I apologise
> for that. At least some documentation came out of it, which is in my
> eyes sth positive.
>
> I've only been around for about 3 months, that is 1/4th of a year and
> in most of that time, Devuan (as a project) has been... let's call it
> dysfunctional. Yes, some progress has been made, however the core
> issues remain: there are tons of blockers, discussion either dies or
> escalates quickly and then gets abandoned without reaching any
> consensus so it all ends up being in vain, leaving questions
> unanswered. The fact that it doesn't seem to be getting any better is
> more than worrisome.
>
> So, how can we get through this and keep it from happening again?
> If the project is to move forward, the root issues leading to the
> current state of affairs have to be resolved.
>
> Thoughts?

There's not much to it besides letting people with actual time do
things...

--
~ parazyd
GnuPG: 03337671FDE75BB6A85EC91FB876CB44FA1B0274
GnuPG: https://parazyd.cf/FA1B0274.asc