:: [DNG] OT: (almost), but tangential…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Erik Christiansen
Date:  
To: dng
Old-Topics: Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done [ Re: TALOS 2 - The Libre Owner Controlled POWER9 Workstation/Server ]
Subject: [DNG] OT: (almost), but tangentially on-topic Re: Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done [ Re: TALOS 2 - The Libre Owner Controlled POWER9 Workstation/Server ]
On 07.09.17 15:42, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 16:32:42 +0200
> Adam Borowski <kilobyte@???> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:51:46PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>
> I have tried asking nicely


That was wise. It might have worked.

> WILL YOU SHUTUP!!!


Losing your temper in an infantile manner is not. And it won't.

> I don't care about your drivel, it has nothing directly to do with
> Devuan


Then don't read this thread. By all means divert it to your spam folder,
if you have the competence.

All lists tolerate a modicum of OT traffic - especially when it is
tangentially on-topic, as is discussion of security risks when running
linux. It is an act of consideration to flag such posts with "OT:", and
that allows one procmail or MUA rule to screen all such traffic.

But your whining, and the traffic which it might take to help you
achieve a little more maturity is OT. So it might be useful for you to
desist.

HAND.

Erik