:: Re: [DNG] Newbies threaten our puri…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: zap
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Newbies threaten our purity :-)


On 05/27/2017 08:02 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Hendrik Boom <hendrik@???
> <mailto:hendrik@topoi.pooq.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     bash wasn't the original shell. 

>
>
> I really did start on Version 6 Unix. I think Version 7 was out by
> then, but the NYIT Graphics Lab didn't ever switch their PDP-11s to
> it. We did have the Ken Thompson shell. We did not have fsck, we used
> icheck, dcheck, ncheck, and clri. Imagine having a routinely used
> program that would clear an inode, because it had duplicate blocks in
> the free list. So, you needed to actually understand a lot more about
> the filesystem to repair it. A detached directory had to be
> reconnected by a systems programmer using adb.
>
> And we ran 4BSD on the first VAX to leave Digital, the one that got
> surreptitiously examined in "The Soul of a New Machine". Even on VAX
> BSD, the filesystems did not write in the correct order and had no
> journal.
>
> I later ported fsck from 2.8 BSD back to version 6 for that place. A
> lot of lost files surfaced overnight, and the operators didn't have to
> understand the filesystem any longer.
>
>     Thanks

>
>     Bruce


Can you not enjoy the delicious sarcasm of this thread!

:)

>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng