hell yeah...you don't meet many anarchists with a lot of gratitude or
compassion.

that seems to be much more common in communes.

labels aside..nature (the world and everything around you) is the giver of
the life we experience. all should consider nature divine especially when
the patterns found in it can communicate with high intelligence levels and
transfer valuable information to the aware perceptive mind. all the great
scientists throughout history learn from nature and always try to replicate
its patterns.

that which is not in coherence with nature's patterns will find entropy
instead of growth.



On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Amir Taaki <amir@???> wrote:

> Why?
>
> - Anarchism is excessively materialist.
> Democratic Confederalism is both ideological and materialist,
> integrating both sides of the philosophy.
> In practice anarchists focus on structure and action while neglecting
> belief and ideology. Some anarchists even pretend we are post-ideology.
>
> - Anarchism is anti-value forming. Anarchism is oriented completely
> around negation of things (state, hierarchy, capitalism .etc).
> Democratic Confederalism is instead based around positive values, a
> driving vision.
>
> - Anarchism has no plan of action except abolition of the state (and
> capitalism).
> Democratic Confederalism has a more realistic agenda for the
> strengthening of the "democratic nation" (civil society) that gradually
> erodes state influence.
>
> - Anarchism has a strong Marxist influence. Democratic Confederalism
> rejects Marxist materialist dialectic.
>
> - Anarchism is an incoherent eclectic mix of concepts. Democratic
> Confederalism starts with the idea of nature being divine, and all the
> philosophy expands from that basis.
>
> - Anarchism has been infiltrated by third-wave feminist degeneracy while
> Democratic Confederalism strongly affirms gender characteristics.
> Focus is on liberation of people, not hedonism.
>
> - Democratic Confederalism integrates contemporary philosophical thought
> whereas anarchism does not.
>
> - Anarchism has no historical narrative, whereas Democratic
> Confederalism has a strong historical basis that appears in early human
> societies across all major continents that explains the origins of the
> state.
>
> - Anarchism can be very dogmatic in its refusal of electoral politics
> and state power whereas Democratic Confederalism is pragmatic in using
> all available means to further its ends, even laying out methodologies
> of using local municipalities to gain political power.
>
> ... many other reasons. I suggest people start studying it. Anarchism is
> rubbish, this is the new thing.
>
> Start here:
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/rojava/comments/5h6fho/democratic_confederalism_
> study_material/
>
> We have to approach our ideology now like a religion and work from that
> basis.
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>