:: Re: [DNG] Wordiness of code.
Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M----\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M-++\MEnrico Weigelt, metux IT consult at <-
M\MMMBrian Nash at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: ael
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Wordiness of code.
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 11:20:30AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
>
> NAK. I wouldn't count a language that uses whitepaces as
> language constructsanything near 'readable'.

FWIW, -1. I have exactly the opposite experience and thus view.
I don't see the point of dogmatic statements without the underlying
reasoning.

ael

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
dng
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [DNG] vdevRe: [DNG] Would you guys hate me if...->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administrated by dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)