Rich Meon wrote:
<<
Quoting Edward Bartolo (edbarx@???):

> The above quote clearly contradicts the scope of Debian Social Contract.
> https://www.debian.org/social_contract

Ummm...

> Item no: 4 is in contradiction of what you are claiming.
>
> Quote from Debian Social Contract:
> <<
> Our priorities are our users and free software

Guess what? They do what they think is best, and claim it best meets
the needs of
their users and the free software community.

You don't think what they do best meets the needs of their users and
the free software community. They think they do.

Was this actually difficult to figure out?
>>

For a "process-person" to claim publishing a manifesto (Debian Social
Contract) and then, unexpectedly, stressing "They do what they think
is best, and claim it best meets the needs of
their users and the free software community", is ironically a rational
somersault that proclaims contradiction.

According to you, voters vote for a political party basing their vote
on the party's electoral manifesto, then suddenly when the party wins
the government, they can be told the government does what they think
is best, and claim it best meets the needs of their electors!

Edward

--
Those who abuse me will be banned immediately from my email account.
Here, I am communicating with supposedly intelligent adults who are
responsible for their actions.